A.F.E. Smith
  • Home
  • Books
    • Marked series >
      • Dawn Rising
      • The Dark Knife
    • Darkhaven novels >
      • Darkhaven
      • Goldenfire
      • Windsinger
  • Shorts
  • Gallery
  • Contact

Who's afraid of the one-star review?

23/3/2014

8 Comments

 
I know a lot of people who won't leave negative reviews on books they have read. If they can't say something nice, they don't say nothin' at all.

The funny thing is, as a reader, I love the one- and two-star reviews. If I'm considering a book purchase, they're the ones I go to first. Because, let's face it, most books with more than a handful of reviews tend to average out at around four stars, so the overall star rating isn't much of a guide. And when you start looking at them individually, an awful lot of four- and five- star reviews don't tell you anything. You could lift them up and plonk them down on almost any other book, and they'd be just as meaningful. It's the negative reviews that tend to be specific.

Which isn't to say that I automatically take their word for it, of course. Pretty much every book has some negative reviews, so if I was swayed by them all I'd end up reading nothing. No, I use the negative reviews to get an idea of the kinds of things other people don't like about the book. Full of typos or historical inaccuracies? I'll give it a miss. Too much swearing, sex or violence? Bring it on.*

Now, I realise that a lot of those who don't like giving negative reviews are writers themselves. They know how much work it takes to complete a book and get it out there. They know how much it hurts when someone hits them with a single star. But the thing is, reviews of a book aren't for the author (though of course they have an effect on her). They're for other readers.

The reviewer doesn't owe the author anything.

If the reviewer hated a book, he has the right to say so. Even if he doesn't say why (ever notice how no-one ever complains that a positive review doesn't come with a side order of justification?). Even if his comments aren't constructive (funny how some authors expect negative reviews to be constructive, as if every reader has the obligation to behave as if he's part of a writing group or a critique site instead of, you know, a customer). Even if he appears to have missed the point of the book completely. As long as the review is honest, and not a personal attack or written with a hidden agenda (that would be getting into tit-for-tatting and bullying and various other nasty behaviour, which is a topic for another day) then it's valid. Moreover, it's necessary.

Because let me ask you this: what would be the purpose of readers only ever reviewing the books they liked? Of all books having only four and five star reviews? Doesn't that make the whole reviewing system meaningless? I can't count the number of times I've considered buying a book dripping with five-star ratings, only to find that the negative reviews tell a different story. Badly edited. Full of spelling mistakes. Loaded with anachronisms. Poorly plotted. No character development. You can't always tell these things from a free sample, which has presumably been polished to within an inch of its life. OK, the negative reviews might be wrong. I have no reason to believe them any more than the positive reviews. But at least they provide some balance. At least they acknowledge that one size doesn't fit all, and that what works for one reader is like a slap in the face for another.

Because the point is, negative reviews are nothing to be afraid of. They don't mean our work is bad. They just mean it doesn't suit everyone. And by identifying why a particular book wasn't right for a particular person, they help us find a better audience for that book in the future. If someone can read a one-star review and realise from it that they'd pick on the same flaws (perceived or otherwise) – well, that's saved us from disappointing a reader. Because that's the main thing, right? We want the people who read our books to be the people who will enjoy them. Since no book is universally loved, anything that can help readers work out in advance whether or not it's likely to appeal to them has to be a good thing.

Every author will be hit with a negative review in their time, and perhaps the trick is to take it as a positive. To that end, check out these thoroughly damning reviews. Each of them was written for a work that's widely regarded as a classic. They aren't meant to be perfect examples of the 'negative reviews help you find your audience' idea that I've just been talking about. But they are meant to cheer you up if you, too, have been hit with a one-star review. Take a guess at which works they're for; the links on the titles will take you to the answers ;-)

Shockingly bad

This is the single most appallingly overrated nonsense I have ever had my displeasure to read. It starts badly […] and just gets worse. The descriptions are turgid, the characterisation unbelievable and the use of language frighteningly dull.

Grotesque sentimentality

The most laborious experience of my reading life. If you are looking for a display of naive romanticism then this is certainly the book for you. I found the motives of the characters shallow and the plot dull.

Awful

This book is awful. No description. No imagery. Can't believe people gave this a five star rating. If I could I would give it zero.

I wish I liked it

I fail to see how it won such mass adoration as an iconic book. I found the plot predictable and slow, the themes and style of writing patronising and overall quite surface level. There are no deeper meanings that can't be found in SparkNotes. The characters aren't original or dynamic in any sense and all seem quite cliché.

Boring!**

Having read some of this man's works I have to say I'm thoroughly disappointed. Considering most of his works have been made into blockbuster films I think it's important to note that this really is a case of the films being better than the books (in all cases). The language used is outdated and terrible for most people to understand. I'm surprised this man has become as successful as he is and I think he is massively overrated.




* Er ... within reason. (She adds hastily, not wanting to come across as a maniac.)

** I hope this one is a joke.
8 Comments
Frank Kusy
23/3/2014 05:10:39 pm

Loved the one on Hardy :) And yes, let the trolls abound, it has been a pleasure to recently learn that I am a boring, boring, boring, calculating, stupid, son of Satan :D

Reply
A.F.E. Smith link
24/3/2014 02:15:42 am

Well, as I said, trolling is different. I don't class personal attacks as fulfilling a useful function for other readers, and as such, I would rather not let the trolls abound! I think they're part of what give negative reviews a bad name :-)

Reply
M T McGuire link
24/3/2014 12:40:55 am

I have absolutely no qualms about getting a crap review for my book. Indeed I did get one for a short story.

What does bug me is if you get one that says something like one a friend had the other day, "why isn't this book free in my country. It is in the US and UK. Amazon should wise up and make it free here too."

On the other hand, the one I got taught me that if you tell people you're selling them a short story, on Amazon, they are expecting a 20,000 word novella.

Reply
A.F.E. Smith link
24/3/2014 02:20:08 am

Yeah, you're right, that's not a useful kind of negative review either. It's like when people give something a one-star rating because it didn't arrive on time. They don't realise that they're supposed to be rating the product, not the service. It would be nice if Amazon and other suppliers provided a better way of getting that kind of thing removed so that the only reviews/ratings left on a book were genuinely about that book (whether positive or negative).

Reply
Jacqueline Pye link
24/3/2014 05:31:41 am

Good points there. Of course reviewing is optional, but I do feel that if people get a copy free (e.g. Goodreads giveaway, ARC or twitter prize) then reviewing is the right thing to do. In my reviews I try to say what I liked and what tripped me up, and why I rated the book as I did. I choose books really carefully so there's rarely a turkey on my shelf, but if there should be, then I'd say why, in the nicest way!

Reply
Diana Jackson link
25/3/2014 12:55:15 am

It makes sense that to have an average the reviews need to be balanced, but the most important thing to me is that they are truthful. Some are helpful to move the author forward and I always try to 'listen' to reviews of my books. That is until recently when a reviewer said an untruth. Why? What was their hidden agenda I wondered. The worst books I've read recently are those where there is an article about the author in the national newspaper - is it a sense of looking after their own or often a celebrity which makes news? The most important thing is that a reader respects the author's work and writes a review. I usually use the 'teacher' approach and write a review sandwich, putting anything I don't like in between some positives. Thanks for the interesting post.

Reply
A.F.E. Smith link
25/3/2014 02:07:25 am

Agreed, honesty and respect are vital. Negative reviews that are rude to the author or that include deliberate untruths are 'personal attack' or 'hidden agenda' reviews, and I wouldn't class either of those as being helpful to other readers.

Rebecca Hamilton
9/4/2014 07:05:22 am

I don't mind HONEST negative reviews. My book has received a few. My book has also received "I don't like you and never bought or read your book, so I'm going to leave a negative review as revenge". One person even completely fabricated what happens in my book and said I was plagiarizing another book. (Hefty claim, but the things they said I was plagiarizing don't happen in my book). For this reason, I hit the "yes helpful" or "like" button on reviews I know are honest (including negative ones) so that they are more visible.

As for leaving reviews, no, I do not leave negative reviews as a writer. 1) I don't want to deal with retaliatory reviews 2) I don't want to piss off the people who do like the book, because they might post negative reviews on my book. It's not that I don't think I should share negative reviews. It's just that I'm not willing to sacrifice getting troll reviews just to say what I didn't like. Someone who doesn't have a book of their own can take care of that :) And, finally, if a book is worth only 1-2 stars, it was so bad I didn't finish it. While some people review books they didn't finish, my approach is usually to share with my friends, "I didn't finish this one. It wasn't for me." and leave it at that. I tend to not be interested in spending MORE time than I have to on a book I didn't like. That include writing a review LOL Now if I LOVE a book, watch out. I can talk about it all day and never shut up! One such book I felt that was about recently was Summoned by Rainy Kaye. Can't. Stop, Thinking. About. That. Book. It's a sick, sick obsession.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

      Enter your email address and click on Submit to receive notifications of new posts.
      Enter your email address here!
    Submit

    Archives

    July 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011

    Categories

    All
    About Me
    Artwork
    A To Z Challenge
    Barren Island Books
    Books
    Character Interviews
    Characterisation
    Darkhaven
    Editing
    Events
    Excerpts
    Fantasy
    Flash Fiction
    Giveaways
    Guest Posts
    Marketing
    Maths
    Pedantry
    Point Of View
    Prophecy
    Publishing
    Reading
    Recommended Reads
    Reviews
    Rules Of Fiction
    Science Fiction
    Serious Stuff
    Sunday Showcase
    Tentacles
    Ugh
    Worldbuilding
    Write Every Day
    Writing

    Or subscribe to my mailing list here!

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Books
    • Marked series >
      • Dawn Rising
      • The Dark Knife
    • Darkhaven novels >
      • Darkhaven
      • Goldenfire
      • Windsinger
  • Shorts
  • Gallery
  • Contact